Home
Guest Posts
Print|Email|Text Size: ||
Animal Cruelty Registry
NYC suburb makes offenders’ identities public

In February, we wrote about California legislators’ efforts to create a statewide animal abuser registry, along the lines of sex offender databases. Although this effort stalled, probably over funding, Suffolk County, N.Y., has created an animal cruelty registry that will be the nation’s first.

 
“The law was prompted by a number of animal abuse cases in recent months,” reports The Huffington Post, “including that of a Selden woman accused of forcing her children to watch her torture and kill kittens and dozens of dogs, then burying the pets in her backyard.”
 
The idea is that a registry will not only keep offenders in check but also provide for the future protection of animals and maybe people, since violence against animals is often a precursor to violence against humans.
 
I sympathize with the impulse to mark these often dangerous people with a scarlet letter but at the risk of drawing your ire—last time around, Bark readers’ general consensus about the registry was a hearty thumbs-up—I have to wonder where we draw the line in creating public, online databases. If we list all the people convicted of animal cruelty, then why not list those convicted of domestic abuse, or arson, or robbery? Why not create neighborhood maps that reveal where every felon lives? I also wonder if the registry might not have a negative impact, taking away offenders’ incentive to reform since they've been publicly flagged. Why not create an easy-to-use, searchable database with access limited to law enforcement, employers in animal-care related fields and shelters and rescues?
 
Honestly, I don’t know where I land on this, but I do think it’s important to move beyond fear and anger to consider the potential consequences of registries of this kind.

 

Print|Email
Lisa Wogan lives in Seattle and is the author of, most recently, Dog Park Wisdom. lisawogan.com

Thumbnail image: iStockphoto

CommentsPost a Comment
Please note comments are moderated. After being approved your comment will appear below.
Submitted by Anonymous | October 21 2010 |

I like the idea, and I also think there should be registries for domestic abusers and child abusers. Anyone who is convicted of a crime that involves intentionally harming another person or animal doesn't deserve to do so in anonymity.

Submitted by Anonymous | November 1 2010 |

I 100% support it! it is a crime afterall, why not have a registry to keep track of ascum like that? the only ones that would be opposition are like minded individuals with something to hide themselves!

More From The Bark

More in Guest Posts:
Zoo Baby: Part 3
Pet Loss Research:
App Review: Dog Decoder
Home-Schooling for Dogs Could Be Catching On
Wisdom Has Gone to the Dogs
Pub Dogs
Zoo Baby: Part 2
Rufo's Story
Canine Urination 101: Handstands and Leg Lifts Are Just the Basics
The First Canine Laryngectomy