JoAnna Lou
Print|Email|Text Size: ||
Animal Cruelty Ruling Overturned in Iowa
A man is cleared of an animal torture conviction based on a technicality
To think that killing a tiny Boston Terrier puppy isn't automatically considered cruelty is unfathomable.

These days more and more states are passing or strengthening animal cruelty laws, but recently progress in this area took a giant step backwards. Last month an Iowa Court of Appeals ruling overturned the conviction of a man who beat a puppy to death with a baseball bat. According to Polk County attorney John Sarcone, this ruling will make it harder for future animal torture cases to make it to trial.

In 2012 Zachary Meerdink was convicted of killing Rocky, his 7-month old Boston Terrier, after the puppy had multiple accidents in the house and bit his girlfriend's children (although it seems there is no actual evidence of this happening on the day of the beating, but that is beside the point).

A three-judge panel voted two to one that prosecutors failed to show Zachary acted with a “depraved or sadistic intent to cause death,” as required by the state's animal torture law. They say that the evidence showed Zachary did not appear happy about the beating and had first tried other ways to change the puppy's behavior.

I don't see how being upset or having attempted to train the puppy makes it okay to kill an animal. Zachary could have easily brought the dog to the animal shelter if he thought the situation was no longer working out.

This case shows how important it is for us to put pressure on our local lawmakers to strengthen animal cruelty laws. Fortunately, there is still hope for getting justice for Rocky. State prosecutors filed an appeal with the Iowa Supreme Court, arguing that a person doesn't have to look “happy or eager” to kill to be convicted of animal torture. They are also asking the high court to clarify the state's animal torture law.

JoAnna Lou is a New York City-based researcher, writer and agility enthusiast.

Photo by USA Today.

CommentsPost a Comment
Please note comments are moderated. After being approved your comment will appear below.
Submitted by Carolyn | August 9 2013 |

For shame, Iowa. I am so very very sorry to hear this.

Submitted by Trudy Nowak | August 10 2013 |

As a puppy raiser for Leader dogs for the blind - Iowa should feel especially ashamed of it's leaders today. There was no common sense in the room with the three judges who heard this case. "He did not seem Happy or Eager when he killed this defenseless animal?" WHAT??????????

How much more SADISTIC or DEPRAVED does someone have to be than to kill a PUPPY with a "baseball bat" to deserve a conviction for animal torture/CRUELTY? I guess they are as out of touch as the people in Stevenson, Washington. A spokesman for the sheriff's office said Dillingham will not be charged with animal abuse because there is no proof the dog suffered. The dog was reportedly killed instantly. Really?????? At least He didn't blow off a piece at a time like this guy did, with the baseball bat, right??

What the hell have we become that we put up with this kind of stupidity from our elected leaders? Rocky suffered at the hands of this man (animal) and if he was happy or eager to kill the dog is not relevant. HE KILLED HIM WITH A BASEBALL BAT, FOLKS. HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU HAVE TO HIT A DOG WITH A BASEBALL BAT BEFORE IT IS DEAD??? That is the questions they should have been asking themselves. Did the animal SUFFER!!! YES, YES, YES..... Then he is Guilty as Charged. Period.

More From The Bark

More in JoAnna Lou:
Canine Hero Returns to Ground Zero
Dogs Prefer Petting Over Praise
Microchip Brings Dog Home Eight Years Later
Canine Curriculum for Kids
Jealousy in Dogs
Shelter Pets at the Emmys
Making Tumors Glow
3-D Printed Dog Cart
New Sport: UpDog
Dog Friendly Car Service in N.Y.C.