Home
Guest Posts
Print|Text Size: ||
Dogs With No Bark
Why people pursue the controversial surgery

Another interesting read out of New York—this time a story about “debarking,” cutting a dog’s vocal chords, on the front page of today’s New York Times. It’s always seemed cruel to me to put a dog through surgery—never without risks—to address a behavioral issue (like de-clawing cats). Aside from health risks, I wonder how my barker would feel if he emitted only a rasp or a whisper with the UPS man on our stoop. It feels like a matter of convenience and lifestyle taking precedence for the owners. Still, the article raises the specter of animals being surrendered because of excessive barking. That’s a stickier wicket—I can’t imagine a dog is better off keeping his or her vocal chords intact but ending up in a shelter.

Print

Lisa Wogan lives in Seattle and is the author of, most recently, Dog Park Wisdom.

Order Dog Park Wisdom

More From The Bark

Justice for Jack ProHeart6 warning
By
Julia Kamysz Lane
By
Lee Harrington
By
Heather Kopsco
More in Guest Posts:
NYC Behavior Program Works with Abused Pups
Case to Protect ADA Rights
Valley Fire Dogs in Need
Best in Health: Purebred or Mixed-Breed?
Think Twice about the Fish in Dog Food
Dog Days of Cleaning
What Else Is In That Supplement?
Pet Summer Safety Guide
Every Dog Needs Love
Does Hollywood Affect a Dog Breed's Popularity?