Home
Guest Posts
Print|Text Size: ||
Dogs With No Bark
Why people pursue the controversial surgery

Another interesting read out of New York—this time a story about “debarking,” cutting a dog’s vocal chords, on the front page of today’s New York Times. It’s always seemed cruel to me to put a dog through surgery—never without risks—to address a behavioral issue (like de-clawing cats). Aside from health risks, I wonder how my barker would feel if he emitted only a rasp or a whisper with the UPS man on our stoop. It feels like a matter of convenience and lifestyle taking precedence for the owners. Still, the article raises the specter of animals being surrendered because of excessive barking. That’s a stickier wicket—I can’t imagine a dog is better off keeping his or her vocal chords intact but ending up in a shelter.

Print

Lisa Wogan lives in Seattle and is the author of, most recently, Dog Park Wisdom.

Order Dog Park Wisdom

More From The Bark

By
Julia Kamysz Lane
By
Julia Kamysz Lane
By
Lisa Wogan
More in Guest Posts:
New Toys and Chews
For the Love of a Ball: Dogs as Conservation Biologists
The Benefits of Having Multiple Dogs
Saving Pennies for a Service Dog
Getting Unsolicited Advice About Your Dog
Describing Your Dog
A Guide To Bringing a Dog Home For The First Time
Marriage Proposal Declined Because of Dog
Proof that Dogs Were Our Ancient Hunting Partners
High School Runners Team Up with Shelter Dogs