Home
Print|Email|Text Size: ||
Dogs With No Bark
Why people pursue the controversial surgery

Another interesting read out of New York—this time a story about “debarking,” cutting a dog’s vocal chords, on the front page of today’s New York Times. It’s always seemed cruel to me to put a dog through surgery—never without risks—to address a behavioral issue (like de-clawing cats). Aside from health risks, I wonder how my barker would feel if he emitted only a rasp or a whisper with the UPS man on our stoop. It feels like a matter of convenience and lifestyle taking precedence for the owners. Still, the article raises the specter of animals being surrendered because of excessive barking. That’s a stickier wicket—I can’t imagine a dog is better off keeping his or her vocal chords intact but ending up in a shelter.

Print|Email
Lisa Wogan lives in Seattle and is the author of, most recently, Dog Park Wisdom. lisawogan.com
More in Guest Posts:
Now You Can Have Fit and Fun Dogs With Very Little Effort
Can Your Home be Beautiful and Dog-Friendly?
Is Your Dog Fat?
Midwest Canine Influenza Outbreak
Dogs Don't Remember Yesterday, Claims Psychologist
Best Dog-Friendly Vehicles
Thinking Outside The Cage
Skiing with Dogs
Helicopter Pet Parents
Dogs Are The Best On A Snowy Day