Home
Print|Email|Text Size: ||
Dogs With No Bark
Why people pursue the controversial surgery

Another interesting read out of New York—this time a story about “debarking,” cutting a dog’s vocal chords, on the front page of today’s New York Times. It’s always seemed cruel to me to put a dog through surgery—never without risks—to address a behavioral issue (like de-clawing cats). Aside from health risks, I wonder how my barker would feel if he emitted only a rasp or a whisper with the UPS man on our stoop. It feels like a matter of convenience and lifestyle taking precedence for the owners. Still, the article raises the specter of animals being surrendered because of excessive barking. That’s a stickier wicket—I can’t imagine a dog is better off keeping his or her vocal chords intact but ending up in a shelter.

Print|Email
Lisa Wogan lives in Seattle and is the author of, most recently, Dog Park Wisdom. lisawogan.com

More From The Bark

By
Kathleen St. John
By
Rebecca Ross
By
Lisa Wogan
By
Julia Kamysz Lane
By
Kate VandenBerghe
By
Lisa Wogan
More in Guest Posts:
Helicopter Pet Parents
Dogs Are The Best On A Snowy Day
Missing Dog is Reunited
Dog Rides Bus to the Park
A Dog Rolling Over During Play Is a Combat Tactic, Not Submission
What’s Wrong with the "Wrong" Dog
Inspired to Make Change
The Difference Between Guide Dog Breeds
Time Magazine and Designer Dogs
Spice's Amazing Transformation