Guest Posts
Print|Email|Text Size: ||
Dogs With No Bark
Why people pursue the controversial surgery

Another interesting read out of New York—this time a story about “debarking,” cutting a dog’s vocal chords, on the front page of today’s New York Times. It’s always seemed cruel to me to put a dog through surgery—never without risks—to address a behavioral issue (like de-clawing cats). Aside from health risks, I wonder how my barker would feel if he emitted only a rasp or a whisper with the UPS man on our stoop. It feels like a matter of convenience and lifestyle taking precedence for the owners. Still, the article raises the specter of animals being surrendered because of excessive barking. That’s a stickier wicket—I can’t imagine a dog is better off keeping his or her vocal chords intact but ending up in a shelter.

Lisa Wogan lives in Seattle and is the author of, most recently, Dog Park Wisdom. lisawogan.com

More From The Bark

More in Guest Posts:
What Else Is In That Supplement?
Pet Summer Safety Guide
Every Dog Needs Love
Does Hollywood Affect a Dog Breed's Popularity?
Clean Carpet Pet Stains Naturally
Audrey Hepburn: Portraits of an Icon (and Dog Lover)
For people on the street, pets provide companionship and protection
Keeping Dogs Safe and Happy This Fourth of July
Beagle: Free to Good Home
The Imaginary Dog Awards