Home
Guest Posts
Print|Text Size: ||
Dogs With No Bark
Why people pursue the controversial surgery

Another interesting read out of New York—this time a story about “debarking,” cutting a dog’s vocal chords, on the front page of today’s New York Times. It’s always seemed cruel to me to put a dog through surgery—never without risks—to address a behavioral issue (like de-clawing cats). Aside from health risks, I wonder how my barker would feel if he emitted only a rasp or a whisper with the UPS man on our stoop. It feels like a matter of convenience and lifestyle taking precedence for the owners. Still, the article raises the specter of animals being surrendered because of excessive barking. That’s a stickier wicket—I can’t imagine a dog is better off keeping his or her vocal chords intact but ending up in a shelter.

Print

Lisa Wogan lives in Seattle and is the author of, most recently, Dog Park Wisdom.

Order Dog Park Wisdom

More From The Bark

By
Julia Kamysz Lane
By
Brenna Malmberg
By
Lisa Wogan
More in Guest Posts:
True Love: The Bond with Our Dogs
Smiling Dog: Molly
Is There a Puppy There?
If I Judged Canine Charm Contests
Smiling Dog: Trumper
Dogs Chasing Laser Pointers
22 Plants You Didn't Know Could Poison Your Dog
Dog Aggression vs Lack of Social Skills
Smiling Dog: Gabby
Smiling Dog: Floyd III