Home
Print|Email|Text Size: ||
Dogs With No Bark
Why people pursue the controversial surgery

Another interesting read out of New York—this time a story about “debarking,” cutting a dog’s vocal chords, on the front page of today’s New York Times. It’s always seemed cruel to me to put a dog through surgery—never without risks—to address a behavioral issue (like de-clawing cats). Aside from health risks, I wonder how my barker would feel if he emitted only a rasp or a whisper with the UPS man on our stoop. It feels like a matter of convenience and lifestyle taking precedence for the owners. Still, the article raises the specter of animals being surrendered because of excessive barking. That’s a stickier wicket—I can’t imagine a dog is better off keeping his or her vocal chords intact but ending up in a shelter.

Print|Email
Lisa Wogan lives in Seattle and is the author of, most recently, Dog Park Wisdom. lisawogan.com

More From The Bark

By
Megan Minkiewicz
By
Lisa Wogan
By
Shirley Zindler
More in Guest Posts:
Does Hollywood Affect a Dog Breed's Popularity?
Clean Carpet Pet Stains Naturally
Audrey Hepburn: Portraits of an Icon (and Dog Lover)
For people on the street, pets provide companionship and protection
Keeping Dogs Safe and Happy This Fourth of July
Beagle: Free to Good Home
The Imaginary Dog Awards
Making Animal Shelters Better
Beware of Algae
Now You Can Have Fit and Fun Dogs With Very Little Effort