Home
Science & History
Print|Email|Text Size: ||
The Future of Dogs
Pages:

Pages

When a beloved dog, whatever its breed, dies, we seek to find another just like him. So we go to a breeder and buy a replica. By doing so we convince ourselves that our departed dog continues to live in the soul of the new one. We think we have purchased his immortality. But we haven’t.

Purebreds represent neither dogs’ past nor their future. As geneticist Richard Dawkins tells us, genes are nearly “immortal.” So those of purebreds are no older than those of mongrels. A dog’s true connection with the past lies in his character and abilities, not his genes. For millennia, dogs were defined by the jobs they did, and crossbred to ensure they would continue to perform them well. When the rural people who created these jobs disappear, dogs lose this past, and attempts to freeze their shapes in time through inbreeding do not preserve it. They merely rob dogs of a future.

Purebreds can be saved only by opening their stud books. Just as the meek shall inherit the Earth, so lowly mixed breeds, including perhaps the few remaining crossbred Jack Russells, represent the future of dogs.

This article is an adaptation from the author’s new book, We Give our Hearts to Dogs to Tear: Intimations of Their Mortality (Transaction Publishers), a memoir of the Chase family’s 32 years in Montana, which they shared with successive generations of Jack Russell Terriers. The book considers the mortality of, and connections between, the land and dogs: how suburbanization and declines in land stewardship threaten the former, and indiscriminate inbreeding by show dog breeders imperils the latter.

Pages:

Pages

Print|Email
This article first appeared in The Bark,
Issue 48: May/Jun 2008
Alston Chase is one of America's foremost nonfiction writers and a leading scholar specializing in intellectual and environmental history. In 1992, he received an Ark Trust Genesis Award Commendation. He, his wife Diana and their seven dogs live in Paradise Valley, Mont.

Photograph coutresy Alston Chase

CommentsPost a Comment
Please note comments are moderated. After being approved your comment will appear below.
Submitted by Lori | December 29 2012 |

I know this was published awhile ago, but I couldn't help comment. What hogwash! After you rattle off the problems associated with purebreds you then rattle off some incoherent rubbish why you continue to support their breeding. I would hope Bark could do better than this. Dogs are individuals. I once had a JR who could care less about hunting or killing anything, thankfully. All she cared about was playing ball. All my mutts and rescue dogs have each been very much individuals: a mixture of their genes, environment and that je ne sais quoi that makes us who we are.

More From The Bark

By
Mark Derr
By
Jane Brackman
By
Claudia Kawczynska
More in Science & History:
Myths: Loyalty Rewarded
Body Language
Is Your Dog Waiting For You?
Scientists Searching for Clues to The First Dog
The Wolf in Your Dog
Alexandra Horowitz, The Canine Mindseeker
DNA Testing
Buffon
Can DNA Decipher the Mix?
Darwin’s Dogs