Home
Print|Email|Text Size: ||
Is the Guardian Campaign Losing Steam?
Does it matter?
Owner, guardian, parent

Back in the early 2000s, a number of municipal governments around the country and in Canada revised their city codes, county ordinances and state legislation as they related to companion animals, replacing the term “owner” with “animal guardian.” In addition, animal welfare professionals, such as animal shelter staff and police and humane society officers, were referred to as guardians. The idea was to reflect in official language the role our dogs, cats and other animals play as members of our families and our role in protecting and providing for them.

The first city to make the change was Boulder, Colo., in 2000. But during the next four years, 40 cities and the entire state of Rhode Island adopted guardian language. Since then, only six cities in the United States have embraced the concept—an average of fewer than one per year, according to In Defense of Animals’ Guardian Campaign.

I wonder if it’s a reflection of hard times. Does a campaign like this seem frivolous with world economic instability, unemployment, climate change, protracted wars and other more urgent issues claiming our attention?

Is this an idea for better, less distracting times or is it as important today as it ever was?

Print|Email
Lisa Wogan lives in Seattle and is the author of, most recently, Dog Park Wisdom. lisawogan.com

More From The Bark

By
Lisa Wogan
By
Kate VandenBerghe
By
The Bark
More in Guest Posts:
Does Hollywood Affect a Dog Breed's Popularity?
Clean Carpet Pet Stains Naturally
Audrey Hepburn: Portraits of an Icon (and Dog Lover)
For people on the street, pets provide companionship and protection
Keeping Dogs Safe and Happy This Fourth of July
Beagle: Free to Good Home
The Imaginary Dog Awards
Making Animal Shelters Better
Beware of Algae
Now You Can Have Fit and Fun Dogs With Very Little Effort