Home
Karen B. London
Print|Email|Text Size: ||
Obama Opposes Breed-Specific Legislation
White House releases official statement

“We don’t support breed-specific legislation.” So begins an official statement from the White House. Breed-specific legislation includes any law or regulation that restricts which dogs people can have based on their breed. The most common breed to be banned is the pit bull. The statement goes on to mention research showing that breed-specific legislation is essentially ineffective at preventing dog bites and injuries, and that it is a waste of the public’s resources. The official statement is presumably a response to an online petition that requests a ban at the federal level on laws that target dogs based on their breed.

It has not been possible to determine accurately bite rates by breeds, and in the absence of reliable data, perceptions are often skewed towards whatever is reported in the media rather than the actual number of bites. At various times, certain breeds have had serious PR problems, and it changes over the years. Decades ago it was rottweilers and doberman pinschers who seemed to face the most discrimination. Now it’s pit bulls who are most often assumed by many to be dangerous just because of what they look like, and not based on any information about specific individuals and their behavior.

The statement from the White House supports the Center for Disease Control’s recommendation that in order to improve public safety, we are better off with a community-based approach to dog bite prevention. The laws about dangerous dogs that deal with individuals who have a history of aggressive behavior are far more sensible than bans on entire breeds of dogs. Dogs vary greatly in their behavior and that variation is substantial within all breeds.

Our society has come a long way in stopping discrimination against people based on appearance, origin and who they are related to. It’s encouraging that we are moving in that direction when it comes to dogs, too. I’m so pleased about this big step towards eliminating discriminatory legislation. What’s your take on it?

Print|Email

Karen B. London, PhD, is a Bark columnist and a Certified Applied Animal Behaviorist specializing in the evaluation and treatment of serious behavior problems in the domestic dog.

photo by maplegirlie/Flickr

CommentsPost a Comment
Please note comments are moderated. After being approved your comment will appear below.
Submitted by H. Rose | August 29 2013 |

I totally agree. No person should ever be judged by their looks and neither should mans' best friend. This is the type of subject that makes me so aggravated! Even though I don't personally own one, every person I've talked to who owns or knows a "problem breed" describes them as loving, kind, and adorable dogs. I'm glad someone's finally taking a stand. I say, Go Pit Bulls!

More From The Bark

Butler -- Weather Channel's Dog
By
Karen B. London
By
Karen B. London
By
Karen B. London
More in Karen B. London:
Knowing Human Names
Stick Close!
Repetitive Behavior in Dogs
Accidents With Dog Toys
Fence Fighting
World Cup Dog Names
Unusual Eating Behavior
Tolerating Petting Shows Patience
Out of Control Biting
Human Walking Program