Home
DogPatch
Print|Email|Text Size: ||
Q&A with Dog Sense Author John Bradshaw
Pages:

Pages

JB: We want to understand what is going on inside these dogs, and I am not in any way blaming rescuers or shelters. Dogs who have been attached to a family may suddenly wind up in a shelter for a variety of reasons: family breakup, job loss or the dog’s behavioral problems. Dogs will be very upset by this and when they arrive in a shelter, their cortisol level [a stress-related hormone] goes sky high. We know this because when we’ve taken urine samples, we’ve had to dilute the urine to even get a measurement — it was that high. They don’t have the resources to cope and go into hyperdrive, desperate to please people. As a result, in a shelter setting, dogs actually can be easily trained.
As I mentioned, attachment can happen quickly in shelters. Of course, when dogs are unhappy, they need to be appropriately cared for, but we find that it’s important to rotate their caregivers so they don’t form an attachment to any one person.
It is also important to assess dogs for separation anxiety, predict the behavior, and advise [shelter staff and prospective adopters] on how to train them to be left alone. That is one of the most important things you can do to ensure the welfare of the dog [in terms of his or her eventual placement] in a new home.

B: Dogs clearly love us, and demonstrate that in many ways, but is this what motivates them to obey us and follow our lead?

JB: Human contact has a high-level reward value for dogs; simple attention from us is rewarding. And if that attention comes while playing with them, it can be a double reward. You can train a dog with a tennis ball, but while the game is important, it is not the only thing. The real treat is the interaction. Withdraw your attention, ignore the dog, and the dog will find this withdrawal of attention aversive.

Pages:

Pages

Print|Email
This article first appeared in The Bark,
Issue 65: Jun/Aug 2011
Claudia Kawczynska is The Bark's co-founder and editor in chief. thebark.com

Photograph by Alan Peters

CommentsPost a Comment
Please note comments are moderated. After being approved your comment will appear below.
Submitted by John Starr, MD | September 11 2013 |

Dr. Bradshaw,
just went through your book "Dog Sense". As a scientist( as yourself)/physician, and as what some might consider an animal whisper ( contrary to popular belief, I cannot tell whether or not my animal likes green curtains as opposed to red), I took one notable exception to your text in the book, and that is by being a scientist you can give someone a test to tell whether or not they "love" someone. You will recall that this was in the chapter "Does my dog love me?". "LOVE" in the truest sense of the word is an indescribable, ineffable concept that can not be tested for. It is a connection that even current and future functional MRIs can and will never be able to demonstrate, at least, so far as the experience itself is concerned. Science does have its' limitations. This is the type connection that " animal whispers" have with animals, that results in animals responding to them the way that they do.

More From The Bark

By
Lisa Wogan
By
Wayne G. Hammond, Christina Scull
By
Dana Standish
More in DogPatch:
Overheard: Authors on dogs
On View: Paul Howard Manship
Dogs for the Ages
Textile Sculptures
Q&A with Theresa Schwegel
Paralympic Skier Dreams Gold
William Wegman
The Frisky Series: Family Dog
Wegman's World
Happy Holidays