|Print |Text Size: |||
Earlier this week at Westminster, two PETA supporters crashed the Best in Show judging with “Mutts Rule” and “Breeders Kill Shelter Dogs’ Chances” signs, highlighting the breeder-shelter debate. Yesterday,
The breeder-shelter debate is a topic that I’ve been conflicted over for a long time. My Sheltie, Nemo, came from a breeder. Being my first dog, I opted to go this route for the predictability, both in personality and health. While genetic testing and breed standards don’t guarantee the dog you get, it certainly increases the chances in your favor.
With millions of animals euthanized in shelters each year, this wasn’t an easy decision. But, as a supporter of adoption, a shelter pup is not out of the question for the future. I do believe that there is room for both purebreds and mutts in the canine world.
This week the New York Times debates this topic and has invited Mark Derr (author and The Bark’s own Science Editor), Ted Kerasote (author), Stanley Coren (psychology professor), and Francis Battista (co-founder of Best Friends Animal Society) to weigh in on the issue.
They raise some interesting view points supporting both sides. Where do you fall in the debate?