
When Washington Post reporter Monica Hesse contacted me about my AKC/mixed breed blog post [3], I was flattered and eager to share my thoughts on this controversial decision. Unfortunately, Hesse was on a tight deadline and we never connected for a formal interview. After reading the piece, I was surprised at its "Lady and the Tramp" mentality [4]. From the first sentence, she paints lovely images worthy of any literary novel, yet they reinforce an ignorant stereotype that purebred dogs are superior over mixed breeds. For example, while attending a dog show where both purebreds and mutts, ahem, mix, she compares the "sly Border Collies, whose owners plaster their cars with bumper stickers reading, 'My Border Collie is smarter than your honor student,' to mixed breed Otis, who "might lick his rear end." Talk about a cheap shot! I've got news for Hesse and the general public--purebreds lick their rear ends. And they probably drink out of the toilet, too. It is my fervent hope that the mingling of purebreds and mixes at AKC events will remind us that they are all dogs, regardless of pedigree. |
Links:
[1] http://thebark.com/print/2125?page=show
[2] http://thebark.com/printmail/2125?page=show
[3] http://www.thebark.com/content/akc-announces-mixed-breed-program
[4] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/23/AR2010052304199.html