|Print |Text Size: |||
In a perfect world, everyone would have great relationships with their dogs--teaching basic manners, providing lots of exercise, and participating in an activity together like agility or therapy work.
Last week, a bill was proposed in New York that would require people to successfully complete a basic obedience class  with their dogs or risk having their pet taken away.
The goal of the bill is to “minimize vicious dog attacks, the destruction of property and unnecessary human or canine deaths; to better acquaint dog owners with their dogs; to teach dog owners proper obedience techniques, which will help owners to have better control of their dogs; and to minimize aggressive dog behavior and negligent dog owner behavior.”
At first glance, the bill seems like a great idea. I only wish more people would take a basic obedience class and spend dedicated time each week bonding and working with their dogs. But I can see many potential problems with the legislation.
For one, not everyone lives in an area like New York City where there are many training classes available. Cost or distance could make a class prohibitive for some people.
Second, the bill would allow the state to establish requirements for dog obedience schools. What and who would define successful completion?
Last of all, I could see this bill making people resent dog training. All of us positive trainers know that the fastest way to get someone to hate something is to try to force them to do it!
New York’s bill has since been defeated, but what do you think about making obedience class mandatory?